“It didn’t pass in the black hole of appropriations, so I think that is a different beast. What does that say about the path forward for regulation? I think a much larger stab at AI is much harder, because we don’t really know where it’s going at this point.”īut even your bill, as narrow and low-hanging as it was, didn’t pass. To me, this felt like the lowest-hanging fruit, and the most important thing to do first because we all agree, hopefully, that we should not be discriminating in these consequential areas. So I came into this thinking, ‘OK, that can’t be what stops this, because we have to protect society, so how do we think about it differently?’ “I have been on the privacy committee my entire tenure, so five years now, and I had seen our previous chair, Assemblymember Chau, do his bills, and every single one failed on this question of ‘What is AI?’ and the definition of AI. Why did you zero in on the question of algorithmic bias with Assembly Bill 331? AI is moving at such a rapid clip.“ĪI is such a broad field. So I see the benefit of a single system of regulation, but none of us trust that D.C. It does create a patchwork across the country that is really hard to comply with for these companies that will be operating across state borders. I think they are open to the states acting. I think they would like to be the ones acting - there’s no question in my mind - but I don’t think they can. “I wouldn’t say Washington is looking to California. “I think is very complementary … but I think our work will go a step further in ensuring that we’re creating a market for safe AI.”ĭo you think Washington is looking to California to lead on this issue? After that trip, and Biden’s sweeping executive order, what do you see as California’s role in this arena? You just got back from Washington, where you met with White House leaders about AI regulation. This conversation has been edited for length and clarity to hear about what’s next for her legislation, and the future of AI in California. We caught up with the lawmaker shortly after her trip to D.C. Her bill didn’t make it out of the Legislature this year, but attracted the attention of tech companies and industry groups across the nation. The sweeping measure was praised by both industry and consumer advocates as an important first step, but without more forceful action from Congress, its impacts are likely to be limited.Įnter California - home of the globe’s most powerful tech companies and the Democrats who have become increasingly willing to go up against them.īauer-Kahan, whose Bay Area district includes major tech hubs, is championing an effort to prohibit “algorithmic discrimination” - regulating automated decision tools that make a determination that may have a significant effect on a person’s life, such as in hiring, medical decisions, or parole rulings. President Joe Biden this week signed an executive order marking the most ambitious national effort yet to guide a rapidly-evolving technology. THE BUZZ: Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan wants California to take the lead on regulating artificial intelligence before it’s too late. California Assemblywoman Rebecca Bauer-Kahan, D-Orinda, at the state Capitol in 2020.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |